MTBI Types Distribution

Prisoner’s Dilemma Core MTBI personality type remains stable throughout life.

MTBI Types Distribution #

What are the rough estimates of the incidence of 16 types as per MBTI classification? #

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most widely recognized personality assessments. It classifies individuals into one of 16 personality types based on four dichotomies:

  • Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I)
  • Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N)
  • Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)
  • Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P)

Estimates for the distribution of these types can vary based on the sample, country, culture, and the method used to gather data. Here’s a rough estimate based on some of the available research and surveys primarily from the United States:

  • ISTJ - 11-14%
  • ISFJ - 9-14%
  • INFJ - 1-3%
  • INTJ - 2-4%
  • ISTP - 4-6%
  • ISFP - 5-9%
  • INFP - 4-5%
  • INTP - 3-5%
  • ESTP - 4-5%
  • ESFP - 4-9%
  • ENFP - 6-8%
  • ENTP - 2-5%
  • ESTJ - 8-12%
  • ESFJ - 9-13%
  • ENFJ - 2-5%
  • ENTJ - 2-5%

Remember, these percentages are very rough estimates and can change depending on the population being studied. For example, certain professions might attract more of one type than others. Additionally, cultural factors can influence the distribution of types in different countries. If you’re interested in more specific or current data, you would need to refer to more recent MBTI research or look into data specific to a certain demographic or region.

Thanks. Give me now stats per each of 4 letters. #

Sure! When we consider the distribution of the individual dichotomies in the MBTI (E vs. I, S vs. N, T vs. F, J vs. P), the percentages can vary based on the population being studied. Here’s a rough breakdown based primarily on data from the United States:

  • Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I)

    • Extraversion (E): 50-55%
    • Introversion (I): 45-50%

  • Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N)

    • Sensing (S): 65-75%
    • Intuition (N): 25-35%

  • Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)

    • Thinking (T): 40-50%
    • Feeling (F): 50-60%

  • Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P)

    • Judging (J): 50-55%
    • Perceiving (P): 45-50%

Again, remember that these are rough estimates, and actual percentages can differ based on various factors like region, culture, and sample size. These numbers give a general idea, but for precise or up-to-date stats, consulting the latest MBTI research or specific demographics would be advisable.

Surely, there were studies about the ‘compatibility’ of these 16 types with each other. Please give me some stats. #

Indeed, there has been a significant interest in the compatibility of MBTI types, especially in areas such as relationships, friendships, and workplace dynamics. The concept of compatibility in the MBTI framework is complex and multifaceted. Compatibility can be influenced by shared values, common interests, communication styles, and other factors that may not strictly fall under the MBTI’s purview.

However, some general observations based on MBTI theory and some studies include:

Similarity Attraction: People might be drawn to those with similar preferences, especially in the long term. For instance, two Judging (J) types might appreciate each other’s structure and planning, while two Perceiving (P) types might enjoy spontaneity together.

Opposites Attract: On the flip side, some believe that opposite types can complement each other. For example, an Extraverted person might help an Introverted partner become more outgoing, while the Introverted partner offers depth and introspection.

Communication Styles: It’s often thought that types with the same Sensing (S) or Intuition (N) preference communicate more easily because they process information similarly. An S-type person tends to be more detail-oriented, focusing on present realities, while an N-type tends to be more big-picture oriented, focusing on future possibilities.

Thinking and Feeling: Thinking (T) and Feeling (F) types can bring different perspectives to a situation. T-types tend to be more logical and objective, while F-types are more empathetic and values-driven. This difference can either lead to complementary cooperation or potential misunderstandings.

The Role of the Tertiary Function: Some theories suggest that people are often attracted to types who are strong in their tertiary function. For instance, an INTJ (whose tertiary function is Introverted Feeling) might be attracted to types with dominant or auxiliary Feeling.

That being said, here are some general patterns often discussed, though these are broad observations and might not hold true for every individual:

NT types (INTJ, ENTJ, INTP, ENTP) might find compatibility with other NTs or even NFs, due to shared intuitive understanding.

NF types (INFJ, ENFJ, INFP, ENFP) might find compatibility with other NFs or NTs, as they share intuitive communication and can have deep philosophical conversations.

SJ types (ISTJ, ESTJ, ISFJ, ESFJ) often appreciate the company of other SJs, as they value traditions, security, and concrete details.

SP types (ISTP, ESTP, ISFP, ESFP) can enjoy the spontaneity and adaptability that other SPs bring.

However, it’s essential to note that while MBTI can provide insights into personality dynamics, it’s not a deterministic tool for compatibility. Many other factors, such as personal values, life experiences, and individual maturity, play a role in successful relationships.

Can an MTBI type of a person change over a lifetime? #

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) posits that an individual’s core personality type remains stable throughout life. According to MBTI theory, this type represents an inherent preference, much like a handedness preference (i.e., being right-handed or left-handed). While you might learn to use your non-dominant hand in various situations, your innate preference doesn’t change.

That said, several factors can influence how a person responds to MBTI questions at different times in their life:

Personal Growth and Development: As individuals grow and face different life experiences, they may develop and mature aspects of their personality. This can make them more well-rounded and flexible in using different parts of their personality, even if their underlying preferences remain consistent.

Environment: If someone is in an environment that consistently rewards or encourages a particular type of behavior (e.g., a very structured job requiring a lot of planning and organization), they might answer questions more in line with that behavior, even if it’s not their natural preference.

Life Changes and Stress: Major life changes or periods of significant stress can influence how someone might answer MBTI questions. For example, after a traumatic event, someone might temporarily display characteristics not typical of their established MBTI type.

Understanding of the Questions: Sometimes, people might interpret MBTI questions differently at various stages in their life, leading to different answers.

Social Desirability: Individuals might answer in a way they perceive as socially desirable or beneficial for a particular setting, like a job application.

In practice, many people report consistent MBTI types throughout their adult lives, but some might experience a change in one or more of the dichotomies. This could be due to any of the factors listed above or even measurement error in the assessment.

In the end, while the MBTI provides valuable insights into personality preferences, it’s just one tool among many. No personality assessment can fully capture the complexity and dynamism of a human being. It’s also worth noting that while the MBTI is popular, there’s ongoing debate in the psychological community about its reliability and validity. As with all personality assessments, it’s essential to use the results as a starting point for understanding and reflection, rather than a definitive label.

Are there any significant differences in the incidence of the 16 types per gender? #

Yes, there are some observed differences in the distribution of MBTI types across genders. It’s essential to approach these statistics with caution, understanding that they’re based on samples and can vary based on factors like culture, geography, and the specific methods of data collection.

Here are some general trends based on available research primarily from the United States:

ISTJ: More common in men than women. ISFJ: More common in women than men. INFJ: Slightly more common in women, but found in both genders. INTJ: More common in men than women. ISTP: Significantly more common in men. ISFP: More common in women than men. INFP: Slightly more common in women, but found in both genders. INTP: More common in men than women. ESTP: Slightly more common in men. ESFP: Slightly more common in women. ENFP: Slightly more common in women, but found in both genders. ENTP: Slightly more common in men. ESTJ: Slightly more common in men. ESFJ: More common in women than men. ENFJ: Slightly more common in women, but found in both genders. ENTJ: More common in men than women. When you look at the individual dichotomies:

Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F): Thinking types (especially the xxTx combinations) tend to be more common in men, while Feeling types (especially the xxFx combinations) tend to be more common in women, based on the data. This reflects traditional gender role socialization but is not deterministic—there are many women who prefer Thinking and men who prefer Feeling.

Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N), Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I), and Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P): Differences between genders are less pronounced in these dichotomies than the T/F dichotomy.

It’s important to note that while these patterns exist in some datasets, individual variation is vast. Everyone is unique, and no one should feel constrained by or pigeonholed into a specific type based on their gender or any other demographic factor.